CASE REPORT
THE GIANT STAGHORN CALCULUS: ANESTHETIC IMPLICATIONS IN DEVELOPING HEALTHCARE SETTING

UDK: 616.61-003.7-089.87

Panovska Petrusheva A1, Gavrilovska Brzanov A1, Skenderi F1

 

1University Clinic for Traumatology, Orthopedic Disease, Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Intensive Care Medicine, and Emergency Department, Faculty of Medicine, “Ss Cyril and Methodius” University, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia

 

Abstract

The giant staghorn calculus represents a serious form of kidney stone disease characterized by the presence of large, bifurcating calculi that occupy the renal pelvis and extend into multiple calyces, resembling the antlers of a stag. Giant staghorn calculi may remain asymptomatic for prolonged periods, and if left untreated can lead to progressive kidney damage, loss of kidney function and life-threatening complications such as urosepsis. Thus, managing a patient with such an extraordinary and advanced renal pathology in a resource-constrained healthcare setting unfolds clinical and anesthetic challenges that demand vigilance and flexibility. We present the case of a 62-years-old male from a rural village near a small city, with an impressive medical history of persistent nephrolithiasis that progressed for years, due to inconsistent follow-up caused by limited financial means. He underwent right nephrectomy for a massive staghorn calculus with negligible functional renal parenchyma. Given the patient’s compromised health status and the presence of a large, fully-configurated complete staghorn calculus, which posed a significant surgical challenge due to its sheer magnitude, it was evident that potential anesthetic risks included hemodynamic instability, sepsis, and altered drug metabolism. Nonetheless, a comprehensive preoperative evaluation, continuous intraoperative monitoring and readiness for rapid intervention ensured a stable perioperative course without complications. Alongside the rarity of this pathology, this case highlights the critical role of anesthesiologists in anticipating and managing the complex challenges posed by such unique pathologies, demonstrating that meticulous planning and resilience enable the delivery of solid and life-sustaining care, even when presented with a narrow spectrum of choices.

 

Key Words: nephrectomy; staghorn calculus; urosepsis.

 

References:

  1. Diri A, Diri B. Management of staghorn renal stones. Ren Fail. 2018 Nov;40(1):357-362. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2018.1459306. PMID: 29658394; PMCID: PMC6014528.
  2. Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I. J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090. Epub 2016 May 27. PMID: 27238616.
  3. Sladen RN. Anesthetic considerations for the patient with renal failure. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2000 Dec;18(4):863-82, x. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8537(05)70199-1. PMID: 11094695.
  4. Mahat A, Duwadi B, Yadav GK, Mishra U. A large Staghorn calculus occupying the entire collecting system. Eurorad. 2023 Aug 24 [cited 2025 Aug 17]. doi:10.35100/eurorad/case.18276.
  5. Schwaderer AL, Wolfe AJ. The association between bacteria and urinary stones. Ann Transl Med. 2017 Jan;5(2):32. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.11.73. PMID: 28217697; PMCID: PMC5300853.
  6. Thapa B, Bhomi KK, Shrestha R, Lamichhane D, Rijal A, Subedi N, Khadka M, Adhikari S, Joshi BR. A silent, giant staghorn calculus managed with open surgery: a case report. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Mar 14;85(4):999-1002. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000294. PMID: 37113920; PMCID: PMC10129240.
  7. Kesharwani D, Samaddar S, Ghose A, Omorphos NP. A silent giant staghorn renal calculus managed successfully with open pyelolithotomy: a case report. J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Jan 13;2022(1):rjab601. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjab601. PMID: 35047181; PMCID: PMC8759461.
  8. Winoker JS, Chandhoke RA, Atallah W, Gupta M. Morphometry scores: Clinical implications in the management of staghorn calculi. Asian J Urol. 2020 Apr;7(2):78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jun 12. PMID: 32257799; PMCID: PMC7096674.
  9. Healy KA, Ogan K. Pathophysiology and management of infectious staghorn calculi. Urol Clin North Am. 2007 Aug;34(3):363-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2007.05.006. PMID: 17678986.
  10. Espinosa-Ortiz EJ, Eisner BH, Lange D, Gerlach R. Current insights into the mechanisms and management of infection stones. Nat Rev Urol. 2019 Jan;16(1):35-53. doi: 10.1038/s41585-018-0120-z. PMID: 30470787.
  11. Flannigan R, Choy WH, Chew B, Lange D. Renal struvite stones–pathogenesis, microbiology, and management strategies. Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Jun;11(6):333-41. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.99. Epub 2014 May 13. Erratum in: Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Jun;11(6):page after 341. PMID: 24818849.
  12. Kumar A, Gogoi S, Kapoor R, Srivastava A, Mandhani A. Management of complete staghorn stone in a developing country. Indian J Urol. 2003 Jan-Mar;19(1):42-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.10587.
  13. Ali SKS, Chatterjee A, Mukhopadhyay NN. A huge right staghorn renal calculi: a case report of inevitable open surgery. Int J Res Med Sci. 2023 Jan;11(1):375‑377. doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20223667.